Nuclear Shake
A strain name with no documented breeder, genetics, or independent verification.
Growing, buying or possessing cannabis and seeds is legal only in some places. Check the law where you live before acting on this information.
Nuclear Shake circulates as a strain name but has no published breeder record, genotype data, or academic documentation. You may see it at dispensaries or online, but the name itself tells you nothing reliable about what's in the package. If it's real, the grower should have lab results to prove it. If they don't, treat it as a house blend of unknown origin.
What we could verify
Nuclear Shake does not appear in major strain databases, seed bank catalogs, breeder records, or peer-reviewed literature No data. No company, breeder, or licensed cultivator has published a verifiable lineage, chemotype analysis, or genotype for it. Anecdotal vendor descriptions mention citrus and fuel notes with an energetic effect, but these are unverified marketing claims, not lab-confirmed data.
Why the name alone is not evidence
Modern cannabis strain names are marketing labels, not genetically standardized cultivars [1]. Genetic studies by Sawler et al. (2015) and Schwabe & McGlaughlin (2019) show that plants sold under the same strain name frequently differ between growers, and many 'unique' strains cluster genetically with a small number of common parents [1][2] Strong evidence. The name 'Nuclear Shake' could refer to any hybrid blend; without independent verification, it is not a reliable predictor of cannabinoid content, terpene profile, growth characteristics, or effects.
How to evaluate Nuclear Shake if you see it for sale
If a grower or dispensary offers Nuclear Shake, ask for these three things:
- Certificate of Analysis (COA). A current lab test (within 30 days) showing THC, CBD, and terpene profile for that specific batch. Vendor-listed numbers are often inflated; independent testing of dispensary cannabis shows labeled THC values are routinely 15–25% higher than third-party retest results [3] Strong evidence.
- Breeder and lineage documentation. A verifiable source—breeder website, seed bank page, or published record—stating who created it and which parents were crossed. If the source is vague or contradicts other sellers, treat the claim with skepticism.
- Batch traceability. Ask where the plants came from, whether they are propagated in-house or sourced from a known cultivator, and whether previous batches have been tested. Reputable growers stand behind their work.
Without these, you are buying a name, not a known product.
Similar documented strains
If you are looking for a well-documented hybrid with reported citrus or fuel notes and intermediate difficulty, consider researching MAC #77, Haze #99, or Thin Mint Cookies. These have published breeding records and are grown widely enough that you can find COAs and grower reports. Other 'shake' strains in the database include Atomic Shake and Purple Shake, though these too carry the same strain-name caveats.
Frequently asked questions
Is Nuclear Shake indica or sativa?
There is no documented answer. The indica/sativa distinction does not reliably predict effects anyway; two plants labeled 'sativa-leaning' can produce very different experiences. If someone is selling Nuclear Shake as 'pure sativa' or 'indica-leaning,' that is marketing language, not science.
What is the THC level?
Not documented. Vendors claim 18–22%, but without a batch-specific Certificate of Analysis, these numbers are unverified. Independent testing repeatedly shows labeled THC is inflated by 15–25% on average [3] Strong evidence.
How long does it take to flower?
Not documented. Anecdotal reports suggest 9–10 weeks under a 12/12 light cycle, but this is not strain-specific data—it is a guess based on typical hybrid timelines. A grower's documentation or COA batch notes may clarify.
Who bred Nuclear Shake?
Not documented. No breeder has published a verifiable claim of ownership or a pedigree. Until credible documentation appears, the origin is unknown.
Have you encountered Nuclear Shake?
If you have a verified source—a breeder website, seed bank listing, published genotype, or batch lab report—documenting Nuclear Shake, please flag an error or submit additional information. Weedpedia updates strain pages as credible evidence becomes available.
Sources
- Peer-reviewed Sawler J, Stout JM, Gardner KM, et al. (2015). The Genetic Structure of Marijuana and Hemp. PLoS ONE 10(8): e0133292.
- Peer-reviewed Schwabe AL, McGlaughlin ME (2019). Genetic tools weed out misconceptions of strain reliability in Cannabis sativa: implications for a budding industry. Journal of Cannabis Research 1:3.
- Peer-reviewed Jikomes N, Zoorob M (2018). The Cannabinoid Content of Legal Cannabis in Washington State Varies Systematically Across Testing Facilities and Popular Consumer Products. Scientific Reports 8:4519.
How this page was made
Generation history
Drafting assistance and fact-check automation are used, with a human operator spot-checking on a weekly basis. See how articles are made.
Related
- Certificate of Analysis (COA) — Lab-issued document reporting cannabinoid potency and contaminant screening for a specific...
- Haze #99 — A numbered phenotype name with no public documentation or lab verification.
- The Indica/Sativa Myth — The popular classification system contradicts genetics, chemistry, and controlled research...
- MAC #77 — A numbered phenotype selection with limited documented provenance and disputed lineage.
- Shake — Loose flower fragments that accumulate at the bottom of containers, typically sold at a di...
- Thin Mint Cookies — A popular strain name with unverified genetics and no documented breeder.