Purple Shake
An obscure purple-leaning cultivar with thin documentation, mostly traded as a novelty phenotype rather than a stable named line.
Purple Shake is one of countless 'purple' strain names floating around dispensary menus and seed forums with no verified breeder of record, no chemotype data in any lab database we could find, and no peer-reviewed mention anywhere. Treat any claims about its lineage, THC percentage, or effects as marketing or grower folklore. If you see it on a shelf, judge it by the COA in front of you, not by the name on the jar.
Overview
Purple Shake is a minor cannabis cultivar name that circulates in informal grower communities and occasional dispensary menus. Unlike well-documented purple lines such as Granddaddy Purple or Purple Punch, Purple Shake has no identifiable originating breeder, no seedbank of record, and no entries in peer-reviewed chemotype surveys No data.
The name itself is ambiguous. 'Shake' in cannabis slang refers to loose, broken-up flower that collects at the bottom of a jar or bag [1]. Some vendors appear to use 'Purple Shake' literally — as a bulk SKU for trim and small buds from purple-phenotype plants — rather than as a distinct genetic line. Buyers should clarify which meaning a given vendor intends.
Chemistry: cannabinoids and terpenes
There is no published chemotype data for Purple Shake in any source we can verify, including the U.S. National Library of Medicine, peer-reviewed cannabis chemotype surveys, or major state cannabis testing databases No data.
Generalizations from related purple cultivars are not a substitute for testing the specific batch in hand. Cannabis chemistry varies dramatically between phenotypes and grows of the same named cultivar — a 2015 analysis of nearly 500 commercial samples found that strain names correlate poorly with chemotype [2] Strong evidence. A 2022 analysis in PLOS ONE reached similar conclusions, finding that commercial strain names do not reliably predict cannabinoid or terpene profiles [3] Strong evidence.
The popular folklore that purple coloration is caused by high anthocyanin content driven by cold nights is partially true — anthocyanin pigments do accumulate in some cultivars under cooler temperatures — but purple color has no established link to potency, effect, or terpene profile Weak / limited. Color is a cosmetic trait, not a chemistry signal.
Reported effects
No clinical or controlled research exists on Purple Shake specifically. Anecdotal vendor descriptions tend to use generic 'relaxing, sleepy, body-heavy' language consistent with marketing copy applied to most purple-named cultivars Anecdote.
The broader assumption that purple or 'indica' strains reliably produce sedation is not supported by chemistry. A widely cited 2015 study by Hazekamp and colleagues found that the indica/sativa labels do not consistently map to chemical profile [2] Strong evidence, and a 2021 study in Scientific Reports by Smith et al. found indica/sativa labels do not align with terpene chemistry in any predictable way [4] Strong evidence. Whatever Purple Shake does for a given person is more likely a function of dose, route, individual tolerance, and the specific batch's cannabinoid and terpene content than of anything implied by its name.
Lineage
Purple Shake has no verifiable lineage. We could not locate a breeder claim, seedbank listing, or pedigree in any reputable seed catalog or grower archive No data. Informal forum posts occasionally speculate about Granddaddy Purple or Purple Kush parentage based on appearance, but speculation from bag appeal is not lineage documentation.
This is common in the cannabis market. Unlike crop registries for hops or grapes, cannabis cultivar names are unregulated, and genetic studies have shown that samples sold under the same name can be genetically distinct, while samples with different names can be nearly identical [5] Strong evidence. Without a breeder of record and a stable seed line, 'Purple Shake' is functionally a label, not a genotype.
Cultivation basics
Because Purple Shake is not offered by any major seedbank we can verify, there are no published cultivation guides, recommended environmental parameters, or documented yields. Any flowering-time or yield claims circulating online should be treated as a single grower's experience with an unverified cut Anecdote.
If you obtain a clone labeled Purple Shake, treat it as an unknown plant: grow a small test run, log flowering time, structure, and finished chemistry via a third-party lab, and don't assume behavior from the name. For genuine purple expression, cooler nighttime temperatures in late flower can enhance anthocyanin coloration in cultivars that carry the genetic capacity for it Weak / limited, but this is a cosmetic outcome and does not change potency.
Marketing vs. reality
Here is the honest summary:
- The name implies a stable cultivar. Reality: no verifiable breeder, no seed line, no chemotype data.
- 'Purple' implies sedation and high potency. Reality: color is cosmetic and does not predict effect [2][4] Strong evidence.
- 'Shake' may mean trim. Some vendors use 'Purple Shake' as a bulk SKU for broken-up purple flower — a product format, not a strain.
- Vendor effect descriptions sound specific. Reality: they are largely generic copy applied across most purple-named products Anecdote.
If you are shopping: ignore the name, read the certificate of analysis, and judge the product by its actual cannabinoid and terpene numbers and your own response to a small dose. That is the only reliable signal in a market where cultivar names are unregulated [5] Strong evidence.
Sources
- Reported Leafly Staff. 'What is cannabis shake and is it worth buying?' Leafly.
- Peer-reviewed Hazekamp A, Tejkalová K, Papadimitriou S. (2016). Cannabis: From Cultivar to Chemovar II—A Metabolomics Approach to Cannabis Classification. Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research, 1(1), 202–215.
- Peer-reviewed Jikomes N, Zoorob M. (2018). The Cannabinoid Content of Legal Cannabis in Washington State Varies Systematically Across Testing Facilities and Popular Consumer Products. Scientific Reports, 8, 4519.
- Peer-reviewed Smith CJ, Vergara D, Keegan B, Jikomes N. (2022). The phytochemical diversity of commercial Cannabis in the United States. PLOS ONE, 17(5), e0267498.
- Peer-reviewed Schwabe AL, McGlaughlin ME. (2019). Genetic tools weed out misconceptions of strain reliability in Cannabis sativa: implications for a budding industry. Journal of Cannabis Research, 1, 3.
How this page was made
Generation history
Drafting assistance and fact-check automation are used, with a human operator spot-checking on a weekly basis. See how articles are made.
Related
- Granddaddy Purple — A heavy, grape-scented indica from early-2000s California that became the template for mod...
- Purple Punch — A sweet, sedating hybrid built on Larry OG and Granddaddy Purple genetics that became a be...