Also known as: Wedding Cake #2 · WC #2

Cake #2

A boutique Wedding Cake selection marketed for dessert-like aroma, with far more folklore than verified data behind it.

Sourced and fact-checked
11 cited sources
Published 42 minutes ago
How this page was made
↯ The honest take

Cake #2 is a pheno/selection from the broader Wedding Cake family, sold by various seed sellers as a distinct cut. There is no peer-reviewed chemistry, effects, or agronomy data specific to 'Cake #2.' Almost everything you'll read about it — exact THC numbers, terpene percentages, effect profiles — comes from breeder marketing and consumer reviews, not lab studies. Treat the strain name as a rough brand, not a reliable predictor of what's in the jar. Insist on a batch COA.

Overview

Cake #2 is one of several numbered selections marketed within the Wedding Cake lineage — a family descended (per breeder claims) from Triangle Kush and Animal Mints [1]. The '#2' designation typically refers to a specific pheno chosen by a breeder or seed bank from a batch of Wedding Cake or Cake-crossed seeds. Because 'Cake' has become a broad marketing bucket covering dozens of cuts (Wedding Cake, Ice Cream Cake, Birthday Cake, Cake Crasher, etc.), the name 'Cake #2' does not map to a single verifiable genetic identity. Different vendors sell different plants under this name Disputed.

Chemistry

No peer-reviewed chemotype data exists for a strain specifically labeled 'Cake #2.' What we can say is contextual:

Bottom line: if you want to know what's in a specific Cake #2 jar, read the batch certificate of analysis. Do not trust the strain name to predict cannabinoid or terpene content — chemotype varies widely between growers even for cuts with identical names [6] Strong evidence.

Reported effects

There are no clinical trials, controlled human studies, or peer-reviewed pharmacological evaluations of Cake #2 specifically. Any effect list you see ("relaxing, euphoric, sleepy, giggly") is aggregated from consumer reviews on menu sites and forums Anecdote.

What evidence does support at a general level:

So when a menu says Cake #2 is 'a heavy indica for sleep,' treat that as marketing shorthand, not a pharmacological claim.

Lineage

Reported lineage for Cake #2 traces back through Wedding Cake, which most sources describe as Triangle Kush × Animal Mints [1] Weak / limited. However:

If lineage matters to you (for breeding, IP, or reproducibility), ask the seller for the specific breeder, the parent cuts used, and — ideally — a genotyping result.

Cultivation basics

There is no published agronomic study of Cake #2. Vendor and grower reports for Wedding Cake–family plants generally describe:

These are reasonable starting points, not strain-specific facts. Any grower publishing exact PPFD, EC, or yield numbers 'for Cake #2' is generalizing from Wedding Cake experience or making it up.

Marketing vs. reality

Common marketing claims about Cake #2 and how they hold up:

Cake #2 may well be a great smoke from a particular grower. Just don't confuse a well-marketed name with verified pharmacology.

Sources

  1. Reported Leafly. Wedding Cake strain profile.
  2. Peer-reviewed ElSohly MA, Chandra S, Radwan M, Majumdar CG, Church JC. A Comprehensive Review of Cannabis Potency in the United States in the Last Decade. Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging, 2021;6(6):603-606.
  3. Peer-reviewed Jikomes N, Zoorob M. The Cannabinoid Content of Legal Cannabis in Washington State Varies Systematically Across Testing Facilities and Popular Consumer Products. Scientific Reports, 2018;8:4519.
  4. Peer-reviewed Smith CJ, Vergara D, Keegan B, Jikomes N. The phytochemical diversity of commercial Cannabis in the United States. PLoS ONE, 2022;17(5):e0267498.
  5. Peer-reviewed Russo EB. Taming THC: potential cannabis synergy and phytocannabinoid-terpenoid entourage effects. British Journal of Pharmacology, 2011;163(7):1344-1364.
  6. Peer-reviewed Zamengo L, Bettin C, Badocco D, Di Marco V, Miolo G, Frison G. The role of time and storage conditions on the composition of hashish and marijuana samples: A four-year study. Forensic Science International, 2019;298:131-137.
  7. Government National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). Cannabis (Marijuana) DrugFacts.
  8. Peer-reviewed Watts S, McElroy M, Migicovsky Z, Maassen H, van Velzen R, Myles S. Cannabis labelling is associated with genetic variation in terpene synthase genes. Nature Plants, 2021;7:1330-1334.
  9. Peer-reviewed Sawler J, Stout JM, Gardner KM, Hudson D, Vidmar J, Butler L, Page JE, Myles S. The Genetic Structure of Marijuana and Hemp. PLoS ONE, 2015;10(8):e0133292.
  10. Government Health Canada. Good Production Practices Guide for Cannabis.
  11. Reported Schwabe AL, Johnson V, Harrelson J, McGlaughlin ME. Uncomfortably high: Testing reveals inflated THC potency on retail Cannabis labels. Reported and discussed via Leafly investigation of Colorado market data.

How this page was made

Generation history

Aug 13, 2026
Fact-check pass — raised 3 flags
Aug 13, 2026
Initial draft

Drafting assistance and fact-check automation are used, with a human operator spot-checking on a weekly basis. See how articles are made.