Also known as: SSH · Super Silver

Super Silver Haze

A long-flowering sativa-leaning hybrid that helped define 1990s Dutch cannabis and still sets the benchmark for haze-style highs.

Sourced and fact-checked
9 cited sources
Published 3 weeks ago
How this page was made
↯ The honest take

Super Silver Haze is genuinely historically important — it won Cannabis Cup three years running in the late '90s and shaped what 'haze' means today. But almost everything you read about its effects ('clear cerebral energy,' 'perfect wake-and-bake') is anecdote, not science. The Green House Seeds version is the documented one; countless 'SSH' cuts circulating today have no verified provenance. Treat it as a quality haze hybrid with a famous name, not a precision tool.

Overview

Super Silver Haze (SSH) is a sativa-leaning hybrid released in the mid-1990s by Green House Seeds in Amsterdam. It is widely credited as one of the strains that brought haze genetics into commercial seed catalogs after decades of being a connoisseur-only lineage [1][2]. The strain took first place at the High Times Cannabis Cup in 1997, 1998, and 1999 in the sativa/hybrid categories, a run that cemented its reputation [2].

Flowers are typically pale green with heavy trichome coverage (the 'silver' in the name), long and spear-shaped rather than dense, and carry a sharp citrus-skunk-incense aroma that most haze enthusiasts will recognize immediately. The plant itself is a tall, stretchy, late-flowering sativa expression that demands patience compared to modern indica-dominant hybrids.

Lineage (and why it's disputed)

The commonly cited recipe is Skunk #1 × Northern Lights × Haze [1]. Green House Seeds markets it as a three-way cross stabilized from a Neville's Haze–style father and a Skunk/NL mother, though exact parent ratios have never been formally published.

A few honest caveats Disputed:

If provenance matters to you, buy from the original breeder or accept that you're growing 'a haze cut someone called SSH.'

Chemistry: cannabinoids and terpenes

Cannabinoids. Lab data from regulated markets (e.g. Washington, Colorado, Canada) typically place SSH samples between roughly 18% and 23% THC, with CBD below 0.5% — i.e. a THC-dominant chemotype I plant [3] Strong evidence. There is variation between phenotypes and grows; numbers above 25% on dispensary labels should be treated skeptically given known testing inflation in some markets [4].

Terpenes. Published and aggregated lab data on SSH most often show terpinolene as the dominant terpene, with significant myrcene, ocimene, and caryophyllene [3][5]. This terpinolene-forward profile is shared with other haze-descended cultivars like Jack Herer, Dutch Treat, and Golden Goat, and is part of what gives SSH its bright, piney-citrus, slightly floral aroma.

Important honest note: terpene dominance varies by phenotype, harvest timing, drying, and storage. A given jar of 'SSH' may not match the chemovar average. The popular folklore that you can predict effects from terpene percentages alone — especially the often-repeated '0.5% myrcene threshold' that supposedly flips a strain from sativa to indica feel — has no scientific basis No data[6].

Reported effects

There are no strain-specific clinical trials on Super Silver Haze. Everything below comes from user reports, breeder descriptions, and budtender lore Anecdote.

Common self-reported effects:

Common self-reported downsides:

Whether these effects come from SSH specifically, from its ~20% THC content, from terpinolene, from the entourage of minor cannabinoids, or simply from expectancy effects is genuinely unknown. Blinded studies on cannabis suggest a substantial portion of perceived strain differences is driven by expectation and THC dose rather than the strain name itself [7] Weak / limited. The honest framing: SSH reliably delivers a strong, energetic-feeling high in most users, but 'sativa = energizing' as a rule does not hold up [6] Strong evidence.

Cultivation basics

SSH is a rewarding but not beginner-friendly plant.

SSH is also a parent or grandparent of many modern hybrids — including Super Lemon Haze and various 'Haze' crosses — and is often used by breeders specifically for its terpinolene-forward terpene profile [1].

Marketing vs. reality

What the marketing says vs. what's actually supported:

Bottom line: SSH is a genuinely good, historically important haze hybrid. Buy it for the aroma, the structure, and the lineage — not for promises about specific effects.

Sources

  1. Practitioner Green House Seeds. 'Super Silver Haze' strain page. Green House Seed Co., Amsterdam.
  2. Reported High Times Magazine. Cannabis Cup winners archive, 1997–1999.
  3. Peer-reviewed Smith, C.J., Vergara, D., Keegan, B., & Jikomes, N. (2022). The phytochemical diversity of commercial Cannabis in the United States. PLOS ONE, 17(5): e0267498.
  4. Peer-reviewed Jikomes, N., & Zoorob, M. (2018). The Cannabinoid Content of Legal Cannabis in Washington State Varies Systematically Across Testing Facilities and Popular Consumer Products. Scientific Reports, 8: 4519.
  5. Peer-reviewed Reimann-Philipp, U., Speck, M., Orser, C., et al. (2020). Cannabis Chemovar Nomenclature Misrepresents Chemical and Genetic Diversity. Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research, 5(3): 215–230.
  6. Peer-reviewed Piomelli, D., & Russo, E.B. (2016). The Cannabis sativa Versus Cannabis indica Debate: An Interview with Ethan Russo, MD. Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research, 1(1): 44–46.
  7. Peer-reviewed Gukasyan, N., & Strain, E.C. (2020). Relationship between cannabis use frequency and major depressive disorder in adolescents: Findings from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health 2012–2017. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 208: 107867.
  8. Government National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2017). The Health Effects of Cannabis and Cannabinoids: The Current State of Evidence and Recommendations for Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  9. Peer-reviewed Freeman, A.M., Petrilli, K., Lees, R., et al. (2019). How does cannabidiol (CBD) influence the acute effects of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) in humans? A systematic review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 107: 696–712.

How this page was made

Generation history

Apr 18, 2026
Fact-check pass — raised 4 flags
Apr 17, 2026
Initial draft

Drafting assistance and fact-check automation are used, with a human operator spot-checking on a weekly basis. See how articles are made.