Also known as: Original Haze · Haze Brothers Haze · OG Haze

Haze

The long-flowering sativa landrace hybrid from 1970s California that became the genetic backbone of modern sativa cannabis.

Sourced and fact-checked
8 cited sources
Published 2 months ago
How this page was made
↯ The honest take

Haze is one of the few strain names that genuinely matters — not as a single plant but as a lineage. The 'Original Haze' from 1970s Santa Cruz is the ancestor of Amnesia Haze, Super Silver Haze, Neville's Haze, and a huge chunk of Dutch sativa breeding. That said, most flower sold today as 'Haze' is hybridized and shares little beyond the name. The story is also semi-mythologized: dates, parents, and personalities vary depending on who's telling it.

Overview

Haze refers both to a specific group of plants bred in coastal California in the 1970s and to the broader sativa lineage descended from them. The original line is widely credited to a group known as the Haze Brothers — R. Haze and J. Haze — working in or near Santa Cruz [1][2]. The plants were notable for extremely long flowering times (often 14+ weeks), tall stretchy structure, spicy-citrus-incense aromatics, and a clear, energetic high that contrasted with the heavier indica-dominant flower then circulating.

What makes Haze historically important is not any single phenotype but its role as breeding stock. Seeds reached Neville Schoemaker of The Seed Bank (later Sensi Seeds) in the Netherlands in the 1980s, where Haze genetics were crossed with faster-flowering indicas to produce commercially viable sativas [2][3]. Nearly every modern 'haze' — Amnesia Haze, Super Silver Haze, Neville's Haze, Lemon Haze, Purple Haze (the modern version) — traces back to those imports.

Lineage (and why it's disputed)

The standard story is that Original Haze was a multi-way cross of landrace sativas: Mexican (Acapulco Gold or similar), Colombian Gold, South Indian, and Thai [2][3]. The exact recipe, ratios, and timeline vary between sources and have never been fully documented in a verifiable way Disputed.

Key uncertainties:

Treat any single-sentence origin story for Haze with skepticism. The honest version is: a Californian sativa population from the 1970s, refined and propagated in the Netherlands in the 1980s, with foggy paperwork.

Chemistry: cannabinoids and terpenes

Modern Haze-lineage cultivars are typically THC-dominant with negligible CBD Strong evidence. Reported THC in commercial Haze hybrids commonly falls between 16% and 22%, with some lab-tested cuts reaching higher [4].

The terpene profile most associated with Haze is terpinolene-dominant, often with significant ocimene, myrcene, and caryophyllene Weak / limited. Terpinolene-dominant chemovars are relatively rare across the cannabis market — one industry analysis of commercial flower in the U.S. found terpinolene-dominant samples making up under 10% of tested flower, and many of those were Haze descendants like Jack Herer, Dutch Treat, and Ghost Train Haze [4][5].

Important caveat: cultivar names are not reliable predictors of chemistry. Studies comparing flower sold under the same name across dispensaries show substantial variation in cannabinoid and terpene content [6]. A flower labeled 'Haze' at one shop may not match a 'Haze' at another.

Reported effects

There are no strain-specific clinical trials on Haze No data. Everything below is user-reported and consistent across consumer-facing databases and grower forums, not controlled research.

Commonly reported effects include:

The 'sativa = uplifting' framing that Haze helped popularize is itself folklore. Indica/sativa labels do not reliably predict subjective effects; chemovar (cannabinoid + terpene profile), dose, set, and setting are far better predictors [7][8]. That said, terpinolene-dominant chemovars are anecdotally associated with the kind of bright, cerebral effect Haze is famous for Weak / limited.

Cultivation basics

Pure or near-pure Haze is one of the more demanding plants to grow:

For most growers, a Haze hybrid (Amnesia Haze, Super Silver Haze) is a far more practical choice than chasing a pure Original Haze cut.

Marketing vs. reality

Things commonly claimed about Haze that deserve scrutiny:

What's actually true and worth remembering: Haze is one of the most influential breeding lines in modern cannabis history, terpinolene-forward Haze descendants do tend to produce a distinctive bright effect for many users, and the original plant took absurdly long to flower — which is exactly why it got hybridized.

Sources

  1. Book Clarke, R. C., & Merlin, M. D. (2013). Cannabis: Evolution and Ethnobotany. University of California Press.
  2. Book Rosenthal, E. (2010). Marijuana Grower's Handbook. Quick American Publishing.
  3. Reported Danko, D. (2018). 'The Haze Story.' High Times Magazine archives.
  4. Peer-reviewed Smith, C. J., Vergara, D., Keegan, B., & Jikomes, N. (2022). The phytochemical diversity of commercial Cannabis in the United States. PLOS ONE, 17(5), e0267498.
  5. Peer-reviewed Reimann-Philipp, U., et al. (2020). Cannabis Chemovar Nomenclature Misrepresents Chemical and Genetic Diversity. Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research, 5(3).
  6. Peer-reviewed Jikomes, N., & Zoorob, M. (2018). The Cannabinoid Content of Legal Cannabis in Washington State Varies Systematically Across Testing Facilities and Popular Consumer Products. Scientific Reports, 8, 4519.
  7. Peer-reviewed Piomelli, D., & Russo, E. B. (2016). The Cannabis sativa Versus Cannabis indica Debate: An Interview with Ethan Russo, MD. Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research, 1(1), 44–46.
  8. Peer-reviewed Watts, S., McElroy, M., et al. (2021). Cannabis Labelling Is Associated with Genetic Variation in Terpene Synthase Genes. Nature Plants, 7, 1330–1334.

How this page was made

Generation history

Feb 14, 2026
Fact-check pass — raised 3 flags
Feb 13, 2026
Initial draft

Drafting assistance and fact-check automation are used, with a human operator spot-checking on a weekly basis. See how articles are made.