MAC #45
A standout phenotype of MAC (Miracle Alien Cookies) selected by Capulator, prized in hype circles but lacking any strain-specific research.
MAC #45 is a specific pheno selection from Capulator's MAC line, hyped in clone-only circles for a creamy, sour-citrus nose and balanced effects. Almost everything written about it online is breeder lore, vendor copy, or user reports — there is zero peer-reviewed work on this cultivar specifically. Treat THC numbers, terpene profiles, and effect claims as ballpark estimates from lab COAs and Reddit, not facts. If you're paying clone-only prices, you're paying for scarcity and a name, not proven superiority.
Overview
MAC #45 is a phenotype selected by the breeder Capulator from his Miracle Alien Cookies (MAC) project, the same breeding work that produced the better-known MAC1 cut [1][2]. Where MAC1 became the flagship clone-only release, #45 circulated as a sibling selection with its own following — described by growers as having a louder citrus-gas nose and slightly more vigor, though these comparisons are entirely subjective Anecdote.
Like most modern hype strains, MAC #45 lives in a documentation gap: breeder interviews and grower forums are the primary record, and no independent botanical or chemical analysis of this specific selection has been published No data. What follows separates what's reasonably established from what's marketing.
Lineage (and why it's disputed)
Capulator has publicly described MAC as a cross of Alien Cookies F2 × (Colombian × Starfighter) [1][2]. MAC #45 is one of the phenotypes pulled from that work. That much is consistent in interviews.
Beyond that, details get fuzzy Disputed:
- The exact Alien Cookies parent line has been described differently in different interviews.
- Several unrelated cuts labeled "MAC" or "MAC #45" circulate without verifiable provenance — clone-only genetics are notoriously prone to mislabeling [3].
- Seed releases sold as "MAC" from other breeders are not necessarily related to Capulator's selections.
If provenance matters to you, the only reliable sourcing is documented Capulator releases or cuts traced back to verified holders. Anything else is a guess.
Chemistry: cannabinoids and terpenes
There is no peer-reviewed chemotyping of MAC #45 specifically. The numbers you see come from dispensary COAs, which vary widely between grows and labs and are known to be inflated industry-wide [4][5].
Cannabinoids (typical reported ranges):
- THC: ~20–25% by dry weight Weak / limited
- CBD: trace (<0.5%) Weak / limited
- Minor cannabinoids (CBG, THCV): not consistently reported
Terpenes: Vendor COAs and user descriptions most often list limonene as dominant, with β-caryophyllene and β-myrcene as common secondaries, and sometimes notable linalool or humulene Weak / limited. The "sour citrus and cream" descriptor people use is consistent with a limonene-forward profile, but terpene content shifts substantially with phenotype, cure, and storage — two jars of "MAC #45" from different growers can read very differently [6].
Be skeptical of any source quoting precise terpene percentages as if they were intrinsic to the strain. They're snapshots of one batch.
Reported effects
Important caveat: There are no clinical trials, controlled studies, or even observational research on MAC #45 or MAC more broadly No data. Everything below is aggregated from user reports on forums, dispensary reviews, and breeder copy.
Commonly reported effects include a balanced head-and-body experience, talkativeness, mild euphoria, and appetite stimulation, with users describing it as functional rather than sedating Anecdote. Some report dry mouth and dry eyes, which are generic cannabis side effects rather than strain-specific [7].
The popular framing of "indica vs. sativa effects" doesn't predict how any given person will respond — that distinction is botanical marketing folklore, not pharmacology [8][9]. Set, setting, tolerance, dose, and individual biology dominate the experience far more than strain name.
Cultivation basics
Most cultivation notes for MAC #45 come from grower forums and should be read as starting points, not specifications Anecdote:
- Flowering time: ~9–10 weeks indoor (63–70 days).
- Structure: Medium-tall, stretches in early flower; responds well to topping and light defoliation.
- Feeding: Reported as sensitive to overfeeding nitrogen; growers commonly run it lighter than other cookies-family plants.
- Yield: Described as moderate — not a commercial yielder, which is part of why it stays in boutique production.
- Environment: Prefers stable temps in the 70–78°F range during flower; dense colas mean airflow matters for mold prevention.
- Sourcing: Authentic cuts are clone-only and trade-restricted. Seed versions sold under the MAC name vary in resemblance to the original.
Marketing vs. reality
MAC #45 sits inside several layers of cannabis marketing that are worth naming directly:
- Clone-only mystique. Scarcity drives price and reputation. A clone being hard to obtain says nothing about whether the flower is meaningfully better than widely available genetics [3].
- THC percentage as a quality signal. Studies have shown labeled THC percentages routinely overstate actual content, and higher THC doesn't linearly translate to a better experience [4][5].
- Terpene-as-destiny claims. The idea that a specific terpene (or a 0.5% myrcene threshold determining "indica couch-lock") predicts effects is folklore, not established pharmacology [9][10].
- Name authenticity. Without a verified clone or breeder-direct seed, "MAC #45" on a label is a marketing claim, not a guarantee of genetics.
None of this means MAC #45 isn't good weed. It often is. It means you should buy it because you like how a specific batch smells, tests, and smokes — not because the name is on a list.
Sources
- Reported Jenkins, M. (2020). 'Capulator on MAC1, breeding, and the modern cannabis market.' GreenState / SFGate.
- Reported Leafly Staff. 'MAC strain (Miracle Alien Cookies) profile.' Leafly.
- Peer-reviewed Schwabe, A. L., & McGlaughlin, M. E. (2019). Genetic tools weed out misconceptions of strain reliability in Cannabis sativa: implications for a budding industry. Journal of Cannabis Research, 1(1), 3.
- Peer-reviewed Jikomes, N., & Zoorob, M. (2018). The cannabinoid content of legal cannabis in Washington State varies systematically across testing facilities and popular consumer products. Scientific Reports, 8, 4519.
- Peer-reviewed Schwabe, A. L., Hansen, C. J., Hyslop, R. M., & McGlaughlin, M. E. (2023). Comparing THC potency from seed to sale: An investigation of consistency in Colorado cannabis labels. PLOS ONE, 18(4).
- Peer-reviewed Booth, J. K., & Bohlmann, J. (2019). Terpenes in Cannabis sativa – From plant genome to humans. Plant Science, 284, 67–72.
- Government National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). 'Cannabis (Marijuana) DrugFacts.'
- Peer-reviewed Sawler, J., Stout, J. M., Gardner, K. M., Hudson, D., Vidmar, J., Butler, L., Page, J. E., & Myles, S. (2015). The genetic structure of marijuana and hemp. PLOS ONE, 10(8), e0133292.
- Peer-reviewed Piomelli, D., & Russo, E. B. (2016). The Cannabis sativa versus Cannabis indica debate: An interview with Ethan Russo, MD. Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research, 1(1), 44–46.
- Peer-reviewed Russo, E. B. (2011). Taming THC: potential cannabis synergy and phytocannabinoid-terpenoid entourage effects. British Journal of Pharmacology, 163(7), 1344–1364.
How this page was made
Generation history
Drafting assistance and fact-check automation are used, with a human operator spot-checking on a weekly basis. See how articles are made.
Related
- Limonene — A citrus-scented monoterpene common in cannabis with promising preclinical effects but lim...