Also known as: Obama-era cannabis policy · Cole Memo era · Ogden Memo era

Cannabis Policy Under the Obama Administration

How a federal enforcement pullback, the Cole Memo, and banking guidance reshaped American cannabis between 2009 and 2017.

Sourced and fact-checked
15 cited sources
Published 1 month ago
How this page was made
↯ The honest take

Obama didn't legalize anything federally — cannabis stayed Schedule I his entire presidency. What changed was enforcement posture. A series of Department of Justice memos told U.S. Attorneys to deprioritize prosecuting state-compliant operators, which gave Colorado, Washington, and the medical states political room to build real markets. The popular framing of Obama as a 'pro-weed president' is mostly myth: arrests continued, federal raids on dispensaries spiked in 2011–2012, and rescheduling petitions were denied. The legacy is procedural, not legislative.

Starting point: what Obama inherited

When Obama took office in January 2009, cannabis was — and remained — a Schedule I controlled substance under the 1970 Controlled Substances Act [1]. Thirteen states had medical cannabis laws, beginning with California's Proposition 215 in 1996, but federal enforcement under the Bush administration had treated state-legal medical operators as ordinary drug traffickers, including high-profile raids on California dispensaries [2].

Obama himself had a documented history of cannabis use as a teenager in Hawaii, recounted in his 1995 memoir Dreams from My Father [3]. As a candidate he said he would not use Justice Department resources to circumvent state medical laws [4]. That campaign promise became the foundation for the policy shifts that followed.

The Ogden Memo (2009)

On October 19, 2009, Deputy Attorney General David Ogden issued a memorandum to U.S. Attorneys titled 'Investigations and Prosecutions in States Authorizing the Medical Use of Marijuana' [5]. The memo instructed federal prosecutors that pursuing individuals 'whose actions are in clear and unambiguous compliance with existing state laws providing for the medical use of marijuana' was 'unlikely to be an efficient use of federal resources.'

The Ogden Memo is often remembered as a green light for dispensaries. That's only half right. It explicitly preserved federal authority to prosecute commercial operations, money laundering, sales to minors, and diversion across state lines. In practice, U.S. Attorneys in California, Montana, and Washington read it narrowly, and federal raids continued — over 200 dispensary raids occurred between 2009 and 2012 by some counts [6]. Strong evidence

The Cole Memos (2011, 2013, 2014)

Deputy Attorney General James M. Cole issued the more consequential guidance. The June 29, 2011 'Cole I' memo clarified that the Ogden Memo did not protect large-scale commercial cultivation, even when state-licensed [7].

The pivotal document came after Colorado (Amendment 64) and Washington (Initiative 502) legalized adult-use cannabis in November 2012. On August 29, 2013, Cole issued the memo most commonly called 'the Cole Memo' [8]. It listed eight federal enforcement priorities — preventing distribution to minors, preventing revenue flowing to cartels, preventing diversion to non-legal states, preventing firearms and violence, preventing drugged driving, preventing cultivation on public lands, preventing possession on federal property, and preventing state-legal cover for trafficking. So long as states maintained 'strong and effective regulatory and enforcement systems' addressing these priorities, DOJ would generally defer to state authority. Strong evidence

On February 14, 2014, Cole and FinCEN issued parallel guidance allowing banks to serve state-compliant cannabis businesses if they filed specific Suspicious Activity Reports [9]. Banking access remained limited in practice, but the guidance created the framework most state markets still operate under.

Congress acts: the Rohrabacher–Farr amendment

The Obama administration did not push legislative reform, but Congress moved on its own. In December 2014, the Rohrabacher–Farr amendment passed as part of the omnibus appropriations bill, prohibiting the Justice Department from spending funds to interfere with state medical cannabis programs [10]. The Ninth Circuit later confirmed in United States v. McIntosh (2016) that the amendment barred DOJ from prosecuting state-compliant medical operators [11]. Obama signed the appropriations bills containing the amendment annually but did not advocate for it.

What didn't change

Several common claims about Obama-era policy are overstated or wrong:

Legacy

By the end of Obama's second term, eight states and DC had legalized adult use, 29 states had medical programs, and an entire regulated industry — testing labs, licensed retailers, ancillary services — existed that had not existed in 2009. None of this required a single act of Congress or change to the Controlled Substances Act. It was built on prosecutorial discretion memos that any future administration could revoke, and one of them was.

The honest assessment: Obama-era policy was a careful, lawyerly hands-off posture rather than reform. It bought the legalization movement eight years of breathing room. Whether that was leadership or simply non-interference is a fair debate, and one the historical record supports examining without mythology.

Sources

  1. Government Controlled Substances Act, 21 U.S.C. § 812 (1970).
  2. Reported Samuels, D. 'Dr. Kush: How Medical Marijuana Is Transforming the Pot Industry.' The New Yorker, July 28, 2008.
  3. Book Obama, B. Dreams from My Father. Times Books, 1995.
  4. Reported Mikkelsen, R. 'Obama says U.S. won't target medical marijuana.' Reuters, March 19, 2009.
  5. Government Ogden, D.W. 'Memorandum for Selected United States Attorneys: Investigations and Prosecutions in States Authorizing the Medical Use of Marijuana.' U.S. Department of Justice, October 19, 2009.
  6. Reported Dickinson, T. 'Obama's War on Pot.' Rolling Stone, February 16, 2012.
  7. Government Cole, J.M. 'Memorandum for United States Attorneys: Guidance Regarding the Ogden Memo in Jurisdictions Seeking to Authorize Marijuana for Medical Use.' U.S. Department of Justice, June 29, 2011.
  8. Government Cole, J.M. 'Memorandum for All United States Attorneys: Guidance Regarding Marijuana Enforcement.' U.S. Department of Justice, August 29, 2013.
  9. Government Financial Crimes Enforcement Network. 'BSA Expectations Regarding Marijuana-Related Businesses,' FIN-2014-G001, February 14, 2014.
  10. Government Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2015, Pub. L. No. 113-235, § 538 (Rohrabacher–Farr amendment).
  11. Peer-reviewed United States v. McIntosh, 833 F.3d 1163 (9th Cir. 2016).
  12. Government Drug Enforcement Administration. 'Denial of Petition To Initiate Proceedings To Reschedule Marijuana,' 81 Fed. Reg. 53767, August 12, 2016.
  13. Government Federal Bureau of Investigation. Uniform Crime Reports, annual editions 2009–2016, 'Arrests for Drug Abuse Violations' tables.
  14. Reported Remnick, D. 'Going the Distance: On and off the road with Barack Obama.' The New Yorker, January 27, 2014.
  15. Government Sessions, J. 'Memorandum for All United States Attorneys: Marijuana Enforcement.' U.S. Department of Justice, January 4, 2018.

How this page was made

Generation history

Apr 2, 2026
Fact-check pass — raised 2 flags
Apr 1, 2026
Initial draft

Drafting assistance and fact-check automation are used, with a human operator spot-checking on a weekly basis. See how articles are made.