Home › Strains › Pure Daze
⚐ Flag an error How this page was made
Also known as: Pure Daze OG

Pure Daze

A strain name seen on some menus, with no verifiable breeder, lineage or published lab data as of October 2026.

Sourced and fact-checked
6 cited sources
Published
Last reviewed
How this page was made

Growing, buying or possessing cannabis and seeds is legal only in some places. Check the law where you live before acting on this information.

↯ The honest take

We could not verify that Pure Daze is an established strain. There is no breeder record, seed listing or published lab analysis that we could find, so any THC figure, effect or parentage on a menu is unverified. If you are holding a jar labelled Pure Daze, the certificate of analysis for that batch tells you far more than the name. For a documented alternative with a similar sativa-leaning reputation, look at Jack Herer or the Haze family.

What we could verify

As of October 2026 we could not find Pure Daze in the major strain databases we checked (Leafly and Seedfinder), nor a breeder page, seed listing or published lab analysis under that name No data. Earlier versions of this page described a sativa-leaning hybrid with 18–24% THC; those figures came from unattributed menu copy and have been removed.

That does not mean no product called Pure Daze exists. Strain names are not registered or protected, so a grower or retailer can give any name to any plant. It does mean that claims about its lineage, THC level, terpenes or effects cannot currently be checked, and this page does not repeat them.

What the name suggests — and why it is not evidence

"Daze" is not an established strain family. Some sellers describe Pure Daze as sativa-leaning or Haze-related, but we found no record supporting that. Similar-sounding names that are documented include Jack Herer and the Haze family.

Names are a weak guide in general. Genetic studies find that samples sold under the same strain name often differ, while differently named samples can be near-identical [2][3] Strong evidence. Lab analyses of US retail flower show that most products fall into a few broad chemical groups that names and indica/sativa labels track poorly [1][5] Strong evidence.

If you see it on a menu

Judge the specific batch, not the name:

Similar, documented strains

Help us improve this page

If you have a breeder record, seed listing or lab report for Pure Daze, please use Flag an error at the top of this page. We will update and re-review the article when verifiable information is available.

Sources

  1. Peer-reviewed Smith, C. J., Vergara, D., Keegan, B., & Jikomes, N. (2022). The phytochemical diversity of commercial Cannabis in the United States. PLOS ONE, 17(5), e0267498.
  2. Peer-reviewed Sawler, J., Stout, J. M., Gardner, K. M., et al. (2015). The genetic structure of marijuana and hemp. PLOS ONE, 10(8), e0133292.
  3. Peer-reviewed Schwabe, A. L., et al. (2023). Cannabis labeling is associated with genetic variation in terpene synthase genes. Nature Plants, 9, 1810–1819.
  4. Peer-reviewed Jikomes, N., & Zoorob, M. (2018). The cannabinoid content of legal cannabis in Washington State varies systematically across testing facilities and popular consumer products. Scientific Reports, 8, 4519.
  5. Peer-reviewed Piomelli, D., & Russo, E. B. (2016). The Cannabis sativa versus Cannabis indica debate: an interview with Ethan Russo, MD. Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research, 1(1), 44–46.
  6. Government National Institute on Drug Abuse. Cannabis (Marijuana) DrugFacts.

How this page was made

Generation history

Oct 29, 2026
Editorial review
Jun 15, 2026
Fact-check pass — raised 2 flags
Jun 15, 2026
Initial draft

Drafting assistance and fact-check automation are used, with a human operator spot-checking on a weekly basis. See how articles are made.