Kush #93
An obscure Kush-labeled cultivar with limited verifiable pedigree and no peer-reviewed strain-specific data.
Kush #93 is one of dozens of numbered Kush selections floating around seed catalogs and dispensary menus. There is no authoritative pedigree, no peer-reviewed chemistry, and no clinical data specific to this cultivar. What you'll find online is marketing copy recycled across sites. If you buy something labeled Kush #93, treat the name as a rough vibe indicator, not a guarantee of genetics or effects. Ask for a current Certificate of Analysis and judge the flower in front of you.
Overview
Kush #93 is a cultivar name that appears on some dispensary menus and seed listings but has no widely documented breeder of record, no registered pedigree, and no peer-reviewed chemistry. It belongs to the broader family of 'Kush' selections descended, at least by name and reputation, from Hindu Kush landrace material brought to the United States in the late 1970s and early 1980s [1][2]. Beyond that broad framing, almost everything specific to Kush #93 is vendor description rather than verifiable fact No data.
Because cannabis strain names are unregulated and not tied to genetic identity, two samples sold as 'Kush #93' from different sources are unlikely to be genetically identical [3] Strong evidence.
Chemistry (cannabinoids and terpenes)
There is no published cannabinoid or terpene profile specific to Kush #93 in the peer-reviewed literature. Vendor pages typically report THC in the high teens to low twenties and negligible CBD, which is consistent with most commercial Kush-labeled flower but not verified for this cultivar No data.
Kush-labeled cultivars as a broad group have been shown to cluster around myrcene, β-caryophyllene, α-humulene, and limonene as dominant terpenes, with substantial sample-to-sample variation [4] Weak / limited. Anyone relying on Kush #93 for a specific chemotype should request a current Certificate of Analysis (COA) from the retailer rather than trusting the name.
The popular claim that '>0.5% myrcene makes a strain sedating' is folklore, not established pharmacology, and should be ignored when reading COAs [5] Disputed.
Reported effects
Vendor and forum descriptions of Kush #93 describe a heavy-bodied, relaxing high with the usual Kush shorthand: 'couch-lock,' 'appetite,' 'sleep.' These are anecdotal reports from unblinded consumers with no controls for dose, tolerance, set, or setting Anecdote.
No clinical trials have studied Kush #93 or, for that matter, almost any specific cultivar. The evidence base for medical cannabis effects generally uses standardized extracts (e.g., nabiximols) or crude THC/CBD ratios, not named flower cultivars [6] Strong evidence. The indica/sativa label — commonly attached to Kush lines as 'indica' — does not reliably predict chemistry or effects [7] Strong evidence.
Lineage
The lineage of Kush #93 is undocumented in any authoritative breeder record we can verify. The '#93' suffix is used by various breeders as a phenotype selection number (e.g., 'pheno 93 from a pack'), but there is no single breeder consistently associated with this name No data.
The broader Kush family traces back to Hindu Kush mountain landraces from the Afghanistan–Pakistan border region, popularized in Western breeding through the 1980s and consolidated into commercial lines such as OG Kush, Bubba Kush, and Master Kush [1][2]. Without a verifiable breeder release, treat any claimed pedigree for Kush #93 (e.g., 'OG Kush × Hindu Kush,' 'Bubba × [something]') as marketing text unless the seller can produce provenance Disputed.
Cultivation basics
Because verified seed stock for Kush #93 is not clearly established, cultivation notes here reflect general characteristics of Kush-family plants rather than this specific cultivar:
- Structure: short to medium, bushy, with broad leaflets typical of Afghan-descended lines.
- Flowering time: approximately 8–9 weeks indoors is typical for Kush hybrids.
- Yield: moderate; Kush lines are not usually top-tier yielders compared to modern hybrids.
- Environment: prefers a dry finish; susceptible to bud rot in humid late flower.
- Difficulty: intermediate — sensitive to overfeeding, otherwise forgiving.
These are general Kush-family observations from cultivation literature [8] Weak / limited, not measurements specific to Kush #93.
Marketing vs. reality
What marketing says about Kush #93:
- 'Classic indica couch-lock.'
- 'Heavy myrcene sedation.'
- 'True Kush lineage.'
What we can actually verify:
- The name is used, but no verifiable breeder, chemotype, or genetic fingerprint anchors it No data.
- Named cultivars sold as the same strain across dispensaries frequently differ genetically and chemically [3] Strong evidence.
- Indica/sativa labels don't predict effects [7] Strong evidence.
- The myrcene-sedation threshold is folklore [5] Disputed.
Practical takeaway: judge the specific jar in front of you (COA, smell, your own titrated dose) rather than the name on the label.
Sources
- Book Clarke, R. C., & Merlin, M. D. (2013). Cannabis: Evolution and Ethnobotany. University of California Press.
- Reported Bienenstock, D. (2016). 'A Brief History of OG Kush.' High Times.
- Peer-reviewed Schwabe, A. L., & McGlaughlin, M. E. (2019). Genetic tools weed out misconceptions of strain reliability in Cannabis sativa: implications for a budding industry. Journal of Cannabis Research, 1(1), 3.
- Peer-reviewed Smith, C. J., Vergara, D., Keegan, B., & Jikomes, N. (2022). The phytochemical diversity of commercial Cannabis in the United States. PLOS ONE, 17(5), e0267498.
- Peer-reviewed Russo, E. B. (2011). Taming THC: potential cannabis synergy and phytocannabinoid-terpenoid entourage effects. British Journal of Pharmacology, 163(7), 1344–1364.
- Peer-reviewed National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2017). The Health Effects of Cannabis and Cannabinoids: The Current State of Evidence and Recommendations for Research.
- Peer-reviewed Watts, S., McElroy, M., Migicovsky, Z., Maassen, H., van Velzen, R., & Myles, S. (2021). Cannabis labelling is associated with genetic variation in terpene synthase genes. Nature Plants, 7(10), 1330–1334.
- Book Cervantes, J. (2006). Marijuana Horticulture: The Indoor/Outdoor Medical Grower's Bible. Van Patten Publishing.
How this page was made
Generation history
Drafting assistance and fact-check automation are used, with a human operator spot-checking on a weekly basis. See how articles are made.
Related
- Hindu Kush — A pure indica landrace from the Afghanistan-Pakistan border region, prized as a foundation...
- Myrcene — The most common monoterpene in cannabis, blamed and credited for a lot of things it probab...
- OG Kush — The hazy-origin California strain that became the genetic backbone of modern American cann...