Cannabis Use in Sufi Orders

What the primary sources actually say

The single most cited medieval source is the Egyptian historian Taqī al-Dīn al-Maqrīzī (d. 1442), whose topographical history of Egypt, al-Mawā'iẓ wa-al-i'tibār fī dhikr al-khiṭaṭ wa-al-āthār (commonly the Khiṭaṭ), contains an extended section on hashish ^[1]. In this account, cannabis use among Sufis is attributed to Shaykh Ḥaydar, a 12th–13th-century ascetic of Khorasan, though al-Maqrīzī himself was writing roughly 200 years after Ḥaydar's death and drew on earlier Arabic sources now lost or fragmentary ^[1] Weak / limited.

According to al-Maqrīzī's narrative, Ḥaydar discovered the plant while wandering in the mountains, noticed its effect on his mood, and shared it with his disciples on condition they keep it secret from non-Sufis ^[1]. Al-Maqrīzī expresses skepticism about parts of the tale, particularly the origin story, but records it as the account circulating among later Sufi communities ^[1]. This account became the source of nearly every 'Ḥaydar legend' retold in Western cannabis literature Disputed.

Other important medieval sources include the jurist Ibn Taymiyya (d. 1328), who issued polemics against hashish use among dervishes in the 14th century ^[2], and scattered accounts by poets and anthologists. The most thorough modern reconstruction of this material is Franz Rosenthal's The Herb: Hashish versus Medieval Muslim Society (1971), which translates and analyzes dozens of Arabic primary sources and remains the standard scholarly reference ^[1].

Which orders used cannabis, and how widely

Cannabis use was not uniform across Sufism; it clustered in specific, often marginal milieus:

The Ḥaydariyya, founded by Quṭb al-Dīn Ḥaydar in Khorasan, are the order most consistently linked to hashish in medieval sources ^[1][2]. They were known for ascetic practices and deliberate renunciation of worldly norms.

The Qalandariyya, a loose antinomian dervish movement that spread from Iran to Anatolia and India in the 13th–14th centuries, were widely accused of hashish use along with other deliberate violations of social norms—shaved heads and eyebrows, iron rings, public nudity, and rejection of conventional dress ^[3]. Contemporary sources describe them as an unregulated movement that attracted criticism from both orthodox jurists and mainstream Sufi orders ^[3].

Some Rifā'iyya and later Bektashi circles in Anatolia and the Balkans have been associated with cannabis or other intoxicants in later sources, though the evidence is anecdotal and less documented than the Ḥaydariyya and Qalandariyya Weak / limited.

In contrast, the mainstream sober orders—the Qādiriyya, Naqshbandiyya, Shādhiliyya, and the Mevlevis associated with Rūmī—generally did not endorse hashish, and many of their masters explicitly condemned it ^[2][3]. The popular Western claim that 'the Sufis used cannabis to reach mystical states' conflates a real internal theological debate into a slogan Disputed.

Legal and theological controversy

Cannabis posed a problem for Islamic jurists because the Qur'anic prohibition on khamr (wine) does not name it. Early medieval jurists debated whether hashish counted as an intoxicant (muskir) and therefore fell under the wine prohibition, or as a 'corruptor of mind' (mufsid lil-'aql) under a separate category, or was permissible ^[2].

By the 14th century the dominant position across the Sunni schools was prohibition. Ibn Taymiyya argued hashish was worse than wine because it caused effeminacy, treachery, and neglect of prayer ^[2][1]. The Mālikī jurist al-Qarāfī (d. 1285) and the Shāfi'ī Ibn Ḥajar al-Haytamī (d. 1566) issued similar rulings Strong evidence^[1]. Penalties in various periods ranged from flogging to, in some Mamluk-era cases, extraction of teeth—a punishment al-Maqrīzī explicitly records ^[1].

Despite formal prohibition, hashish remained widely available in major cities. Al-Maqrīzī describes specific Cairo gardens, notably the 'Garden of Cafour,' where cannabis was cultivated and sold, and reports repeated, ineffective government crackdowns from the 14th century onward ^[1]. This pattern of legal prohibition alongside persistent use characterizes most of the medieval Islamic world.

How the story reached the West

Most Western readers encounter the Sufi-hashish connection through a transmission chain: al-Maqrīzī → Silvestre de Sacy's 1809 French translation and commentary → 19th-century European Orientalists → 20th-century cannabis writers like Ernest Abel and Martin Booth Weak / limited.

At each step the narrative became tidier and more romantic. Silvestre de Sacy, writing in the context of Napoleon's Egyptian campaign, analyzed the Ḥaydariyya as part of a broader study of Middle Eastern dervish movements and attempted to link the Nizārī Ismā'īlīs to hashish use Disputed. This conflation—blending genuine Sufi cannabis culture with sensationalized stories about political assassination cults—has been largely rejected by modern scholars but shaped popular Western understanding for two centuries Disputed.

The upshot: when a modern cannabis blog states 'Sufis used hashish to commune with God,' the underlying source is nearly always al-Maqrīzī's 15th-century account filtered through 19th-century French scholarship. The claim is not false, but it is one historian's account of a figure who lived 200 years before his time, repackaged repeatedly across centuries and languages.

What remains uncertain

Several commonly stated claims lack direct historical support:

The historical reality of Ḥaydar. Whether Ḥaydar was a real individual as described or a composite figure around whom the cannabis-origin narrative crystallized remains disputed Disputed. Al-Maqrīzī's skepticism about the legend suggests the story may have been a founding myth rather than strict biography.

Sacramental vs. recreational use. Whether cannabis was used specifically as a sacrament in formal Sufi ritual (dhikr, samā'), or simply consumed by dervishes in daily life, is ambiguous in primary sources. The line between 'sacramental' and 'recreational' is itself a modern category that maps poorly onto medieval practice Weak / limited.

Pre-Islamic continuity. Some scholars argue Central Asian cannabis use predated Islam and was absorbed into Sufism via Khorasan; this is plausible given archaeological evidence of cannabis in the region, but the direct chain of transmission is not documented in surviving texts Weak / limited.

Preparation methods. Pipes for smoking tobacco—and potentially cannabis—did not reach the Islamic world until after tobacco arrived in the late 16th century. Medieval Sufis ate hashish, often mixed into pastes or pastilles, sometimes combined with honey or sesame ^[1][2]. Early claims that Sufis smoked cannabis in water pipes reflect post-16th-century practice, not medieval reality.

Legacy and naming

The Sufi-cannabis association persisted into the Ottoman period and shaped how cannabis was used, named, and regulated across the Islamic world. The Persian and Turkish word esrar ('secrets'), still used for hashish in Turkey and Iran, reflects the old Ḥaydariyya and Qalandariyya injunction to keep the herb hidden from the uninitiated and authorities ^[1].

For the modern reader, the honest historical summary is: yes, real Sufis did use cannabis, particularly in the Ḥaydariyya and Qalandariyya, sometimes as part of their spiritual practice. No, this was never the practice of Sufism as a whole, and it was actively contested by mainstream Sufi orders and Islamic jurists. And the picturesque version of the story circulating in contemporary cannabis culture—Sufis smoking in ecstatic communion—owes more to 19th-century French Orientalism and the later Club des Hashischins than to any medieval source.

Sources

How this page was made

Related

• Cannabis on the Silk Road — Archaeological and textual evidence of cannabis in ancient Eurasian trade networks.