Cannabis Activism in the Middle East During the 1910s

What activism means, and what did not exist

Modern cannabis activism — organized advocacy for legal reform, civil rights framing, or public education campaigns — is a late-20th-century phenomenon. In the 1910s Middle East, no such movement is documented in the historical record Weak / limited. ^[1] What existed instead was a long-running tension between hashish consumers (urban cafés, Sufi circles, rural users), smugglers and producers, and state authorities pursuing prohibition ^[1][2].

Consumption, smuggling, and state enforcement are not the same as activism. Consuming a drug or evading police is not political action; activism requires organized, deliberate advocacy for policy change, typically expressed through writing, public assembly, or civil-society institutions — all of which were sparse or absent in the region during this era.

Claims on cannabis blogs that there were '1910s hashish rights movements' in Egypt or the Levant lack support in primary sources or in the major academic histories of the period. The serious scholarship — Liat Kozma, James Mills, Cyrus Schayegh, Haggai Ram — consistently describes a decade of tightening prohibition, not organized pushback against it. ^[1][2][3]

Egypt under British occupation: the center of hashish policy

Egypt was the regional epicenter of hashish politics in the 1910s. Cultivation had been banned since the 1870s, and importation since 1879, but consumption remained widespread, especially among working-class men in urban cafés ^[1]. The Egyptian Coast Guard and Customs Administration spent the 1910s in a running battle with smugglers bringing hashish primarily from Greece, and secondarily from Ottoman Syria and Lebanon ^[1].

Thomas Russell (known as Russell Pasha), the most famous anti-hashish campaigner of the era, rose to prominence in the 1920s when he headed the Central Narcotics Intelligence Bureau. In the 1910s, the policy machinery was already in place: hashish was illegal, possession was criminalized, and the debate among officials concerned enforcement, not legalization ^[1][2].

There are no documented Egyptian newspapers, political parties, or civil-society organizations campaigning for hashish liberalization during the 1910s. Weak / limited Café culture and consumption persisted as a de facto practice, but practice is not the same as activism. The absence of such records from multiple archival and historiographic sources suggests the absence was real, not merely the result of poor documentation.

The 1912 International Opium Convention and international control

The 1912 International Opium Convention, signed at The Hague, was the single most important cannabis-policy event of the decade. Egypt—represented by Mohamed El Guindy—pushed hard to have hashish (Indian hemp) included alongside opium and cocaine in international control ^[3][4]. The final Convention text included recommendations urging signatory nations to study the cannabis question, though binding international cannabis control would not come until the 1925 Geneva Convention and later instruments ^[3][4].

The Ottoman Empire was a signatory. Domestically, Ottoman authorities had banned hashish cultivation in several provinces during the late 19th century, and enforcement in places like the Beqaa Valley (then Ottoman Syria) remained inconsistent through the 1910s, particularly once World War I disrupted state capacity ^[1]. Lebanese hashish production expanded during and after the war partly because central authority had collapsed—not because of activist pushback, but because of the absence of state capacity to enforce prohibition.

Confusion: where the '1910s activism' myth originates

Several distinct historical threads are sometimes conflated or retrofitted into a fictional '1910s activism' narrative:

Sufi and folk defense of hashish. A long theological tradition, going back centuries, saw Sufi orders defend hashish on religious or mystical grounds. This was cultural and theological, not political activism. By the 1910s this position had been marginalized by Salafi reformers and by state authorities in both the Ottoman Empire and Egypt. ^[1] Weak / limited This does not constitute political activism for legal reform.

Smuggling networks and criminal resistance. Armed smuggling operations resisted Egyptian Coast Guard interdiction throughout the 1910s. This was organized crime responding to enforcement, not civil-society advocacy for policy change. ^[1]

Backdating of later policy debates. Egyptian and Lebanese cannabis politics in the 1920s–1930s involved real policy discussions around the Geneva conventions and treaty compliance. Online sources sometimes carelessly push these later debates into the 1910s, creating a false appearance of an earlier movement. Weak / limited

Confusion with industrial hemp lobbying. Hemp industry interests in Europe and North America did engage in policy advocacy during this era, but this had nothing to do with Middle Eastern drug-hashish politics. ^[1]

What the historical record actually shows

The primary evidence for the 1910s comes from:

• Egyptian police and coast guard records documenting smuggling and enforcement ^[1]
• International diplomatic records from the 1912 Hague Convention ^[3][4]
• Ottoman administrative records and enforcement attempts in Syria and Lebanon ^[1]
• Contemporary European colonial and consular reports ^[1][2]

These sources consistently show a picture of consumption, smuggling, and prohibition—not organized advocacy for legal change. No newspapers, pamphlets, political platforms, or organized gatherings demanding cannabis liberalization appear in the scholarly record. The institutional preconditions for such activism—a free press, legal civil society, public assembly rights—were largely absent under late Ottoman rule and British occupation. ^[2]

Gaps in the historical record

The Arabic-language press of the 1910s has not been exhaustively digitized or surveyed for cannabis-related commentary. No data It is possible that individual editorials, satirical pieces, or pamphlets defending hashish use exist in archives that have not been widely studied. If such material is ever surfaced and authenticated, the picture could shift modestly—but the absence of any mention of such material in major scholarly works suggests it is either nonexistent or marginal.

Anyone claiming evidence of 1910s organized cannabis activism in the Middle East should be asked to produce a specific primary source: a newspaper article, a manifesto, records of meetings, or correspondence among activists. Without such evidence, the claim remains folklore, not history.

Sources

How this page was made

Related

• Cannabis Activism in East Asia During the 1910s — No organized cannabis activism existed in East Asia during the 1910s; the era was defined...
• Cannabis Activism in South Asia During the 1910s — Colonial administrators used the 1894 Hemp Commission report to block cannabis prohibition...
• Cannabis activism in the Middle East during the 2000s — How a small network of harm-reduction and legalization advocates emerged in a region with...
• Cannabis Regulation in North Africa in the 1910s — Colonial powers replaced customary tolerance with monopolies, taxation and early prohibiti...
• Cannabis Literature in the Middle East During the 1910s — A decade of diplomatic framing rather than literary innovation around cannabis in the Midd...
• Cannabis Music in Mexico During the 1910s — Cannabis references in Mexican revolutionary-era folk songs, their spread, and how myth ob...
• UN Drug Treaties and Cannabis — Three UN treaties control cannabis globally; legalization exists despite treaty language f...